Banco Inverlat Lawsuit
Informational website regarding Rita Maria Sanchez de Hernandez, Et Al V. Bank of Nova Scotia
Español | Search tips

Case Summary

In 1992, a group of investors owned 95 percent of Banco Inverlat, one of Mexico's largest banks. A few years later, those same investors owned less than 10 percent of the bank, and the Bank of Nova Scotia (aka Scotiabank) owned the rest.


How that loss of ownership—and the loss of the hundreds of millions of dollars in profit derived from that ownership—happened is at the center of a lawsuit filed by more than 100 Banco Inverlat investors. The plaintiffs contend that Banco Inverlat was taken from them by Scotiabank, which breached its obligations by putting its own interests ahead of those of the investors and manipulating a takeover.


In Depth: Case HistoryBank of Nova Scotia | Peso Crisis


LATEST UPDATES

5.19.10

Plaintiffs File Appeal.

Plaintiffs have filed an appeal of the Court's order dismissing their claims. Click here for a copy of our Opening Brief, Scotiabank's Response Brief and our Reply Brief.


9.21.09

Scotiabank's Third Dispositive Motion Granted.

The Court granted BNS's third attempt to have the case thrown out. The Plaintiffs have asked the Court to reconsider his ruling and have filed notice of their intent to appeal the ruling. Click here to view the Court's ruling, and here to view our motion for reconsideration.


3.3.09

Scotiabank Files a Third Dispositive Motion.

Having failed in their first two attempts to get the case dismissed, BNS has now moved for a third time to dismiss the case. See their Motion for Summary Judgment, the Plaintiffs' Response (including all of the evidence referenced therein) and their Reply to the Plaintiffs' Response. To view a transcript of the recent hearing regarding this filing click here .


10.24.08

Court Grants Show Cause Order.

Court grants Show Cause Order setting hearing on Plaintiffs' request for
leave to file 5th Amended Complaint for November 13, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Click here to view the order.


10/23/08

Plaintiffs File 4th Amended Complaint.

Plaintiffs file 4th Amended Complaint asserting a breach of contract under
Mexican law.  Plaintiffs also file a Motion to Show Cause as to why they
should not be granted leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint asserting a
cause of action for "unjust enrichment" under Mexican law.

More updates>

Case Updates |Case History |Selected Court Filings |In The News |FAQ |The Legal Team